British germ war tests sound very familar to Chemtrails.
In the process of investigating chemtrails, I have seen all kinds of theories, and information. Most pointing in all different directions.
This is one piece of information that I see as being vital. It is an article from the gaurdian.co.uk titled Millions were in germ war tests, Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials.
gaurdian.co.uk
A key section of this article is:
"The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution.
The tests, carried out by government scientists at Porton Down, were designed to help the MoD assess Britain's vulnerability if the Russians were to have released clouds of deadly germs over the country.
In most cases, the trials did not use biological weapons but alternatives which scientists believed would mimic germ warfare and which the MoD claimed were harmless. But families in certain areas of the country who have children with birth defects are demanding a public inquiry.
One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.
While the Government has insisted the chemical is safe, cadmium is recognised as a cause of lung cancer and during the Second World War was considered by the Allies as a chemical weapon."
This is a clear case of the government testing methods of using chemical warfare on unsuspecting and innocent people. They said oh don't worry Cadmium is safe even though it was considered a chemical weapon. Cadmium is a heavy metal. Just like Aluminum and Barium, which are both suspected to be two of the main ingredients of chemtrails. Both Aluminum and Barium exposure have very toxic side effects such as breathing difficulties, increased blood pressures, heart rhythm changes, stomach irritation, muscle weakness, changes in nerve reflexes, swelling of brains and liver, various cancers, paralysis, sterilization, kidney and heart damage.
With Aluminum, Barium, GMO's, Aspartame (in our food) and Sodium Fluoride (in the water) being consumed on a daily basis. It really does look like an ideal situation for world depopulation. These heavy metals cause all kinds of health issues that can be fatal and reduce life expectancy. They also cause sterilization. Our children are going to grow up to be sterile and plagued with health problems. A real win / win situation for the elite. While keeping control of you while you are alive, with the health care system and the pharmaceutical companies. We also will not be able to reproduce!
Who needs a destructive war, when you can depopulate with hidden chemicals??
As I have said in previous post's. Health Canada and Environment Canada say that chemtrails are just the work of our over active imaginations. It is very clear that they are not! We must stand up and demand answers! If we do not our children and grandchildren will suffer!
This is why We Are Change Brantford is proud to present Chemtrail Awareness Week. This event will run from May 1 2010 to May 8 2010. No matter where you are, you can take action! You could hand out flyers or DVD's, call you MP's, Call into radio show's and other media outlets, take pictures/videos of chemtrails and post them any where you can, get out and just talk to your friends and nieghbors about it. Every little bit will help! Lets take action Canada wide! Or even internationally!
Join the Chemtrail Awareness Week on Facebook HERE
Aspartame has been renamed and is now being marketed as a natural sweetener
(NaturalNews) In response to growing awareness about the dangers of artificial sweeteners, what does the manufacturer of one of the world's most notable artificial sweeteners do? Why, rename it and begin marketing it as natural, of course. This is precisely the strategy of Ajinomoto, maker of aspartame, which hopes to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with its rebranded version of aspartame, called "AminoSweet".
Over 25 years ago, aspartame was first introduced into the European food supply. Today, it is an everyday component of most diet beverages, sugar-free desserts, and chewing gums in countries worldwide. But the tides have been turning as the general public is waking up to the truth about artificial sweeteners like aspartame and the harm they cause to health. The latest aspartame marketing scheme is a desperate effort to indoctrinate the public into accepting the chemical sweetener as natural and safe, despite evidence to the contrary.
Aspartame was an accidental discovery by James Schlatter, a chemist who had been trying to produce an anti-ulcer pharmaceutical drug for G.D. Searle & Company back in 1965. Upon mixing aspartic acid and phenylalanine, two naturally-occurring amino acids, he discovered that the new compound had a sweet taste. The company merely changed its FDA approval application from drug to food additive and, voila, aspartame was born.
G.D. Searle & Company first patented aspartame in 1970. An internal memo released in the same year urged company executives to work on getting the FDA into the "habit of saying yes" and of encouraging a "subconscious spirit of participation" in getting the chemical approved.
G.D. Searle & Company submitted its first petition to the FDA in 1973 and fought for years to gain FDA approval, submitting its own safety studies that many believed were inadequate and deceptive. Despite numerous objections, including one from its own scientists, the company was able to convince the FDA to approve aspartame for commercial use in a few products in 1974, igniting a blaze of controversy.
In 1976, then FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt wrote a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy expressing concern over the "questionable integrity of the basic safety data submitted for aspartame safety". FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill believed that a grand jury should investigate G.D. Searle & Company for lying about the safety of aspartame in its reports and for concealing evidence proving the chemical is unsafe for consumption.
Despite the myriad of evidence gained over the years showing that aspartame is a dangerous toxin, it has remained on the global market with the exception of a few countries that have banned it. In fact, it continued to gain approval for use in new types of food despite evidence showing that it causes neurological brain damage, cancerous tumors, and endocrine disruption, among other things.
The details of aspartame's history are lengthy, but the point remains that the carcinogen was illegitimately approved as a food additive through heavy-handed prodding by a powerful corporation with its own interests in mind. Practically all drugs and food additives are approved by the FDA not because science shows they are safe but because companies essentially lobby the FDA with monetary payoffs and complete the agency's multi-million dollar approval process.
Changing aspartame's name to something that is "appealing and memorable", in Ajinomoto's own words, may hoodwink some but hopefully most will reject this clever marketing tactic as nothing more than a desperate attempt to preserve the company's multi-billion dollar cash cow. Do not be deceived.
